Shell advisor quits, accusing agency of ‘extreme harms’ to environment | Shell

A senior safety consultant has give up working with Shell after 11 years, accusing the fossil gas producer in a bombshell public video of causing “extreme harms” to the setting.

Caroline Dennett claimed Shell had a “disregard for local weather change dangers” and urged others in the oil and fuel business to “walk away whereas there’s still time”.

The chief, who works for the impartial agency Clout, ended her working relationship with Shell in an open letter to its executives and 1,400 employees. In an accompanying video, posted on LinkedIn, she stated she had stop due to Shell’s “double-talk on local weather”.

Dennett accused the oil and gas firm of “working past the design limits of our planetary methods” and “not putting environmental security before manufacturing”.

She stated: “Shell’s said security ambition is to ‘do no harm’ – ‘Objective Zero’, they call it – and it sounds honourable but they are fully failing on it.

“They know that continued oil and gasoline extraction causes extreme harms, to our local weather, to our environment and to individuals. And no matter they say, Shell is simply not winding down on fossil fuels.”

Dennett advised the Guardian she “couldn't marry these conflicts with my conscience”, adding: “I couldn't carry that any longer, and I’m ready to deal with the results.”

Shell was a “main client” of Dennett’s business, which specialises in evaluating safety procedures in high-risk industries including oil and fuel manufacturing. She started working with Shell within the aftermath of BP’s Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010, which rocked the business.

“I can not work for an organization that ignores all the alarms and dismisses the dangers of climate change and ecological collapse,” she stated. “As a result of, contrary to Shell’s public expressions round net zero, they aren't winding down on oil and fuel, however planning to explore and extract rather more.”

Dennett – a legal justice graduate who has spent her profession in research and consultancy – was inspired to cease working with Shell after watching news footage of Extinction Revolt local weather protesters urging the corporate’s employees to go away. The movement’s TruthTeller whistleblowing challenge encourages oil and fuel workers to stroll away from the trade.

The advisor, who runs internal safety surveys and relies in Weymouth, Dorset, acknowledged she was “privileged” to have the ability to stroll away and “many people working in fossil gas corporations simply aren’t so lucky”.

She urged Shell’s executives to “look in the mirror and ask themselves if they really believe their imaginative and prescient for extra oil and gasoline extraction secures a protected future for humanity”.

In late 2020, several Shell executives in its clean power sector left amid stories they were annoyed at the tempo of Shell’s shift in direction of greener fuels.

Her announcement comes on the eve of Shell’s AGM in London on Tuesday. Its plans to reduce emissions will be discussed at the assembly the place the Dutch activist group Follow It will push for the corporate’s policies to be extra consistent with the Paris climate accord. Shell’s board has told buyers to reject the group’s decision that asks it to set extra stringent climate targets.

The Shell investor Royal London has said it intends to abstain on a vote on the firm’s climate transition proposals.

The Shell chief government, Ben van Beurden, might experience an investor rebellion against his £13.5m pay packet at the AGM after the investment adviser Pirc urged a vote towards it.

Sign up to the daily Enterprise Right now email or observe Guardian Enterprise on Twitter at @BusinessDesk

A Shell spokesperson said: “Be in little question, we're determined to deliver on our global technique to be a internet zero company by 2050 and 1000's of our people are working onerous to achieve this. Now we have set targets for the quick, medium and long term, and have every intention of hitting them.

“We’re already investing billions of dollars in low-carbon vitality, although the world will still want oil and gasoline for decades to return in sectors that can’t be simply decarbonised.”

Shell additionally faces the prospect of a potential windfall tax to fund cuts to family payments after the vitality trade reported bumper income fuelled by the rise in market costs, prompting opposition events to call on the government to bring in a one-off levy.

On Monday, the most important oil and fuel producer in the North Sea spoke out in opposition to a one-off levy, arguing it could lead to the business approving fewer tasks.

Harbour Energy’s chief executive, Linda Prepare dinner, advised the Financial Occasions: “The next tax burden will make it more challenging for new oil and gasoline projects to fulfill funding hurdle charges, that means fewer tasks will probably be sanctioned.

“This is at a time when industry is being encouraged to extend home UK oil and gasoline manufacturing and help an orderly energy transition.”

Harbour has advised the federal government it plans to speculate $6bn in the North Sea over three years as trade makes its case towards the tax. The Guardian revealed this month that Prepare dinner had acquired a £4.6m “golden howdy” from the agency.