Shell advisor quits, accusing agency of ‘excessive harms’ to setting | Shell

A senior safety marketing consultant has stop working with Shell after 11 years, accusing the fossil fuel producer in a bombshell public video of causing “extreme harms” to the setting.

Caroline Dennett claimed Shell had a “disregard for climate change dangers” and urged others within the oil and fuel business to “walk away whereas there’s still time”.

The executive, who works for the independent agency Clout, ended her working relationship with Shell in an open letter to its executives and 1,400 employees. In an accompanying video, posted on LinkedIn, she stated she had give up due to Shell’s “double-talk on local weather”.

Dennett accused the oil and gasoline firm of “working beyond the design limits of our planetary systems” and “not placing environmental security earlier than manufacturing”.

She stated: “Shell’s stated safety ambition is to ‘do no hurt’ – ‘Goal Zero’, they call it – and it sounds honourable but they are completely failing on it.

“They know that continued oil and fuel extraction causes excessive harms, to our local weather, to our environment and to folks. And whatever they say, Shell is solely not winding down on fossil fuels.”

Dennett instructed the Guardian she “couldn't marry these conflicts with my conscience”, adding: “I couldn't carry that any longer, and I’m able to take care of the consequences.”

Shell was a “major consumer” of Dennett’s enterprise, which specialises in evaluating safety procedures in high-risk industries including oil and gasoline production. She started working with Shell in the aftermath of BP’s Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010, which rocked the industry.

“I can now not work for a corporation that ignores all of the alarms and dismisses the risks of climate change and ecological collapse,” she said. “As a result of, opposite to Shell’s public expressions around web zero, they aren't winding down on oil and gas, but planning to explore and extract way more.”

Dennett – a prison justice graduate who has spent her career in research and consultancy – was inspired to cease working with Shell after watching information footage of Extinction Rebel climate protesters urging the corporate’s staff to depart. The movement’s TruthTeller whistleblowing undertaking encourages oil and fuel staff to stroll away from the business.

The marketing consultant, who runs internal security surveys and relies in Weymouth, Dorset, acknowledged she was “privileged” to have the ability to walk away and “many individuals working in fossil gas firms simply aren’t so lucky”.

She urged Shell’s executives to “look within the mirror and ask themselves in the event that they really imagine their imaginative and prescient for extra oil and gas extraction secures a secure future for humanity”.

In late 2020, a number of Shell executives in its clean vitality sector left amid experiences they had been annoyed on the tempo of Shell’s shift towards greener fuels.

Her announcement comes on the eve of Shell’s AGM in London on Tuesday. Its plans to scale back emissions will probably be mentioned at the meeting where the Dutch activist group Observe It will push for the corporate’s insurance policies to be extra in keeping with the Paris climate accord. Shell’s board has instructed buyers to reject the group’s decision that asks it to set more stringent climate goals.

The Shell investor Royal London has mentioned it intends to abstain on a vote on the firm’s climate transition proposals.

The Shell chief government, Ben van Beurden, could experience an investor insurrection against his £13.5m pay packet on the AGM after the investment adviser Pirc urged a vote towards it.

Sign up to the daily Business As we speak electronic mail or observe Guardian Business on Twitter at @BusinessDesk

A Shell spokesperson mentioned: “Be in little doubt, we are decided to ship on our global technique to be a web zero firm by 2050 and 1000's of our individuals are working laborious to achieve this. We now have set targets for the quick, medium and long term, and have every intention of hitting them.

“We’re already investing billions of dollars in low-carbon vitality, although the world will nonetheless want oil and fuel for many years to come in sectors that may’t be easily decarbonised.”

Shell also faces the prospect of a possible windfall tax to fund cuts to household payments after the energy trade reported bumper profits fuelled by the rise in market costs, prompting opposition events to name on the government to usher in a one-off levy.

On Monday, the biggest oil and fuel producer in the North Sea spoke out towards a one-off levy, arguing it might lead to the business approving fewer tasks.

Harbour Energy’s chief govt, Linda Cook dinner, informed the Financial Times: “A better tax burden will make it more challenging for brand new oil and fuel tasks to meet investment hurdle rates, which means fewer projects might be sanctioned.

“That is at a time when industry is being encouraged to increase home UK oil and fuel manufacturing and assist an orderly energy transition.”

Harbour has told the government it plans to take a position $6bn within the North Sea over three years as business makes its case towards the tax. The Guardian revealed this month that Cook dinner had acquired a £4.6m “golden hiya” from the firm.