Shell consultant quits, accusing firm of ‘excessive harms’ to setting | Shell

A senior security guide has quit working with Shell after 11 years, accusing the fossil gasoline producer in a bombshell public video of causing “excessive harms” to the atmosphere.

Caroline Dennett claimed Shell had a “disregard for local weather change dangers” and urged others in the oil and gasoline business to “walk away whereas there’s nonetheless time”.

The chief, who works for the unbiased company Clout, ended her working relationship with Shell in an open letter to its executives and 1,400 staff. In an accompanying video, posted on LinkedIn, she mentioned she had quit due to Shell’s “double-talk on climate”.

Dennett accused the oil and gas agency of “working beyond the design limits of our planetary techniques” and “not putting environmental security earlier than production”.

She said: “Shell’s stated safety ambition is to ‘do no harm’ – ‘Aim Zero’, they name it – and it sounds honourable however they're completely failing on it.

“They know that continued oil and gasoline extraction causes extreme harms, to our local weather, to the environment and to people. And whatever they say, Shell is solely not winding down on fossil fuels.”

Dennett told the Guardian she “could not marry these conflicts with my conscience”, adding: “I couldn't carry that any longer, and I’m able to cope with the consequences.”

Shell was a “major consumer” of Dennett’s enterprise, which specialises in evaluating security procedures in high-risk industries together with oil and gasoline production. She began working with Shell within the aftermath of BP’s Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010, which rocked the trade.

“I can not work for a company that ignores all of the alarms and dismisses the dangers of climate change and ecological collapse,” she stated. “Because, contrary to Shell’s public expressions around net zero, they are not winding down on oil and gas, but planning to discover and extract way more.”

Dennett – a criminal justice graduate who has spent her profession in research and consultancy – was inspired to stop working with Shell after watching information footage of Extinction Riot climate protesters urging the corporate’s workers to go away. The movement’s TruthTeller whistleblowing mission encourages oil and fuel workers to stroll away from the trade.

The marketing consultant, who runs internal safety surveys and is predicated in Weymouth, Dorset, acknowledged she was “privileged” to have the ability to stroll away and “many people working in fossil gas companies simply aren’t so fortunate”.

She urged Shell’s executives to “look in the mirror and ask themselves in the event that they really believe their imaginative and prescient for more oil and fuel extraction secures a secure future for humanity”.

In late 2020, several Shell executives in its clean power sector left amid reviews they were frustrated on the pace of Shell’s shift in direction of greener fuels.

Her announcement comes on the eve of Shell’s AGM in London on Tuesday. Its plans to scale back emissions will probably be mentioned at the meeting where the Dutch activist group Comply with This can push for the company’s insurance policies to be more in step with the Paris climate accord. Shell’s board has instructed traders to reject the group’s resolution that asks it to set more stringent climate goals.

The Shell investor Royal London has said it intends to abstain on a vote on the agency’s climate transition proposals.

The Shell chief government, Ben van Beurden, could experience an investor rebel in opposition to his £13.5m pay packet on the AGM after the investment adviser Pirc urged a vote towards it.

Sign up to the day by day Business As we speak electronic mail or comply with Guardian Business on Twitter at @BusinessDesk

A Shell spokesperson mentioned: “Be in no doubt, we're determined to deliver on our global strategy to be a web zero company by 2050 and hundreds of our individuals are working exhausting to realize this. We have now set targets for the quick, medium and long term, and have every intention of hitting them.

“We’re already investing billions of dollars in low-carbon energy, though the world will nonetheless want oil and gas for decades to come back in sectors that can’t be simply decarbonised.”

Shell also faces the prospect of a potential windfall tax to fund cuts to family payments after the vitality industry reported bumper profits fuelled by the rise in market costs, prompting opposition parties to call on the federal government to herald a one-off levy.

On Monday, the largest oil and fuel producer within the North Sea spoke out against a one-off levy, arguing it will lead to the business approving fewer initiatives.

Harbour Energy’s chief executive, Linda Cook, advised the Financial Times: “The next tax burden will make it more challenging for brand new oil and fuel initiatives to satisfy funding hurdle charges, that means fewer tasks will likely be sanctioned.

“This is at a time when industry is being inspired to increase home UK oil and gas production and assist an orderly power transition.”

Harbour has told the federal government it plans to take a position $6bn within the North Sea over three years as business makes its case towards the tax. The Guardian revealed this month that Cook had obtained a £4.6m “golden hi there” from the agency.